Shopping you may not have tried:
Fossil
Pink Mascara
Piperlime
Raffaello Network
Blog Home About blog & blogger Write me My favorite fashions Wishlists n fablists sketches etc
Find us on the web Ways to keep up with us My style n favorite look sites Shop my favorites Shop my boutique Find this on the sidebar for now

Ella’s Picks for Oscars’ Worst Dressed (2010) – Vote!

Fierce then the New Classic: Twirl Around

(like the Classic Scrolldown)

Zoe Saldana in Givenchy Couture at 2010 Oscars

Zoe Saldana in Givenchy Couture

In a way I think this could be “Best” but I’m torn. In my last post I compared Zoe’s violet ruffles to beautiful flowers, but from the back they seem to be growing out of hand. And then the bottom of the train … has … 3 giant fuzzy fingers?

worst-oscars-fashion-zoe-saldana-givenchy-couture

Wait! That looks like a giant Muppet hand ...

oscars-fashion-worst-zoe-saldana-muppet-hand

Zoe Saldana’s gown has even made it to our final “worst” poll at the end of the article…

Pages: 1 2 3

 

Re the Famous Louis Vuitton Garbage Bag: Is Marc Jacobs “Trashing” Fashion Victims?

Right when this buzzworthy Louis Vuitton bag hit the ‘net, I was scrambling to fit in coverage of the late Alexander McQueen and what of NY Fashion Week I could, so my usual dissing of bad design had to wait. And wait past my flu. But I love critiquing design and publishing fug fashion more than runway shows, so without further ado…

In probable social commentary, Marc Jacobs has finally “done it”? with a possible reply to the Chanel hobo that resembled a trash bag.

louis-vuitton-besace-hobos-garbage-bags

You too can wear a trash bag for only $1960!

Two thoughts:

  1. Is the worse part the tell-tale orange cinch-tie, or the “Louis Vuitton” wording for the logo-addicted?
  2. Buyer beware! We think this bag is an intended insult to those who’ll carry anything with LVs – regardless of style. This “purse”  will signal any carrier as a fashion victim. Easily.

Unless you’re an Olsen Twin. Ah, yes – it’s so perfect for them, it might have been made for them to finally solidify their fashion status as hobos. We still think even they won’t take that bait. ;-)

 

Editors vs. Bloggers: Ella Bitches Both Sides.

*Grammar update*
I’m updating this post because I’ve learned something that relates, and I’m sure this little part of the grammar world can be found in my article. (I’m too busy to read it all again.)
Apparently, what every English teacher I know informs of prepositions is incorrect. (If you don’t want to read that page, I’ll write the gist here: some prepositions can be used at the ends of sentences.)

I will now write with less difficulty and, even more happily, less awkwardness. ‘Twas such an awkward rule, wasn’t it?

tavi-bow-hat-view

The View from the Middle: We're All on Equal Ground Now

It isn’t a popular position for a blogger herself to whine about (a) successful blogger(s), but at least that is only a small part of the upcoming several-fold rant. Well I’m not going to whine about success anyway, and I will only half bitch about the editors too. Everyone in the world is sometimes wrong and we’ve been reading so much of this cat fighting that I am itching to say just a few things.

First of all, everyone’s mean! Sure it’s safe to say that corporate-hired folks “started it”. Example: AOL’s Style List Katie Hintz-Zambrano pretty much accused famous 13 year old blogger, Tavi, of being no lady—whatever that means it does sound loaded. Yet then FashionIndie publisher antagonized all professionals for having expensive student loans yet small success. (Rant 2:) While attempting to argue against pros in this piece the blogger didn’t exactly prove one doesn’t need college with an article littered with terrible writing. See a large quote below as an example.

“Katie realize that fashion is a fickle little beast that is addicted to flavors of the week. The current flavor are over the top style bloggers like Tavi, Bryan Boy and Sea of Shoes, individuals with small readerships that manage to get attention cause they look odd* (or fabulous in the case of SeaGirl) and stand out in the streams of black, gray, and weathered that is the traditional garb of old school media types; you know, those overweight, fumpa bellied** folks who work at low readership publications like Paper Magazine and Village Voice who for years have taken over the front rows.”

Yeah I’ve been holding in my opinions – for the most part – about successful so-called writers who are as literate as the average person but actually attempt to publish and, while successfully in their own rights by their own hands, do so with a lot of opinion but zero talent.

Why is paying college tuition as “out” as three-decade-old faded bell-bottoms? While I don’t agree with the degree system, some education itself is priceless when it comes to things like grammar knowledge. Microsoft doesn’t sell that in package with PCs and paying high-speed Internet bills doesn’t grant us magic literary pills. Proper English is not something to disregard and learning it can not come easy. True that the average reader doesn’t know better but professional writers and editors do and I am not surprised they’re pissed that Jr. High-essay-level penners are so popular.

To me it’s not Tavi and her front row that I think is the only upsetting thing to insiders – and I’m refreshed that at least with her I can’t expect better writing than her age (although I think she far from writes worse than most adults). I, as someone who grasps the English language and is tormented by popular readership sites with authors who – to me – can’t write to save their lives — can’t imagine that this is also not upsetting to those who earned their big desk jobs.

~*If you like it then you shoulda put a belt on it*~

~*If you like it then you shoulda put a belt on it*~

*Third part of rant: Yeah, professionals, even fashion ones sometimes, are supposed to dress “professionally”; not “crazy”, most of the time—unlike girls – or boys – playing dress-up in their bedrooms and taking that to the street. Fashion is diverse, often about couture, but to me it’s a lot about flattery and not at all about a drapery, cheap or expensive label, that “fits” like a shapeless sheet. Where is the beauty in this outfit (right) – complete with hideous tights that appear to be mismatched knee socks? Oh yeah, I want to take fashion tips from that. (Not that I need any from anyone after years of Stacy and Clinton – all I need, babies.)

To add to the ugliness, I cannot hold it in, silver hair (or blue as some call it) on her makes her look 90 years old. It’s not cute.

However that FashionIndie representative thinks it’s “unthinkable” to diss Tavi’s (still-rookie?) style (and shows the position with unintelligible wording).

“[Stylelist's Katie Hintz-Zambrano] also does the unthinkable by calling her style “warrant serious eye rolls”. Oh snap!!!”

I do like that, for some time, a fashionista blogger showing her own style can lead to a following – what better way is there? Sadly, I’ve been horribly camera shy for several years with the reason lending itself to a future article on self esteem, weight, accepting oneself, etc. (I plan to follow that by me attempting to keep up with occasional or frequent ensemble shots, even though I still cannot be cloned—I being the only photographer my perfectionist self trusts.)

**The epidemic of not only obesity but of less-endangered-weighted women feeling frightened to be seen by the world or even themselves is my rant #4. It took me a long time to realize I am not actually fat – in fact I look beautiful, sexy, curvy, have a waist etc… I’m just no thinner than average even if sometimes larger. With only that amount of extra size on me, I’ve been terrified to show myself – and even though I’ve recently gotten over that for the most part, my fear of the camera adding 20 lbs (yep 20) is always difficult to overcome.

So to those so called indie fashionistas who are still to this day so insulting of weight as to say “fumpa bellied” (whatever that is) – yes, I am outraged at you and cannot stop at just pointing out this wrong you have made.

Yet who am I to argue? Where do I come from? (How much is jealousy, as one could excuse?) I’d let my posts speak for themselves as that is clearly all I currently have to show (and many are now missing photos, html and categories after years of changes and moves). I don’t think I even necessarily deserve grandeur at this point – I’ve made many individual business mistakes that leave me no wonder as to why I’m not more successful, so I’m not factoring my small position or using any bitterness in this reply. I’m human open to animal weakness but that is the truth. I’ve just seen such horrible lashing out that I’m compelled to put my 2 cents in, as my opinionista self just needs to do. I admire the simple beauty of bloggers making it by showing their style, and I’m hopeful that I can soon make this work for myself a bit – even though I usually go out looking mostly normal (except to male opinion) and if that holds a girl back, so what(?).

I don’t even mind if there’s bad writing by some fabulous or even crazy fashionista making it bigger through beautiful or quirky photos of their style and others’. One, the other, or both – it must be at least visual or literary, I say – and with both makes best. A fashion news or opinion site with apparent lack of even spell check, let alone proofreading, that lends to questioning what the writer’s first language even is —- also not cute, just like a sad sack.

Stop bashing the pros and editors you appear to not even aspire to struggle to equal in talent.

I’ll leave you with this quote, from Tavi’s own final word on the fight she partially inspires.

“The Bloggers vs. Editors! thing is tired. If there was a real competition, editors wouldn’t be willing to give bloggers press. Blogs and magazines are good for different things; it’s like comparing apples with oranges. Collaboration, not competition. Always!”

(And only one grammatical error.) I kind of like her brain, just not always the eye that creates some of her ensembles. ;-) You should read that article … and/or more of my blog. ;-)

 

*Bitch Alert* Olsen Twins act more as Outfit Stylists than Designers for New Clothing Line

Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen with "Olsenboye"

Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen with "Olsenboye"

I watched Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen debut “their” new clothing line, Olsenboye, on Good Morning America yesterday, underwhelmed and over-annoyed. The young adult twin stars proudly, although it was inexplicable pride, described the pairings of pieces sounding much more like dressup players or perhaps even wardrobe stylists, which is to be kind, as instead of showing true design (which can not be faked) they didn’t even try when announcing clothes with phrases something like “we paired that with…” and “blazers are great“. Seriously. Seriously? What?! … If a blazer is great, buy one. *scoff*

That is not design. They cannot force whole outfits on people to get a unique look – girls (only some and not masses of true collection fans vs. Olsen fans) would buy individual pieces and these singular items are just so regular. They fall into the category of this word I’ve sort of invented and now love to use: undesigned, or they are … undesigns.

Love in the City tee - OlsenboyeTo boot, what makes blazers so great to so many – the flattering waist-giving shape – is absent in the depicted floaty jacket.

Oh and, of course, a graphic tee with a phrase (not even a great, funny or terribly unique phrase) in a few fonts obviously does not a design make. DUH!

Stick to being fashion plates, girls. You like fashion, you like trends, but you really just like dressing yourselves. If you want to dress others, call yourselves what you are apparently attempting to be – stylists. However that is kind of a career step down, for even Rachel Zoe is making it much bigger by starring in her own TV show.

Oy.

Watch the full video clip while it’s available via Hulu, below.

 

Common Cold Accessory: Not Hot

Two moms have invented “Sniffle Buddies”: *extra* mini sleeves upon which for kids to wipe their noses. Because that’s way better than wiping on a shirt sleeve. Oh yeah.

It’s a fashion disaster too scary to recommend imagining, but the worst part is these two new business partners also sell adult sized versions.

Ugggghhh. I don’t feel too well.

Read more about these mothers’ story or browse the Sniffle Buddy Shop.

 

“Dread (lock) Santa Hat” !?! – Dread is Right!

dreadlocks-santa-hat

You too can have long white dreads under your Santa hat. Because nothing represents the North Pole like a Rastafarian, especially a really old one.

However if you love that rasta-aesthetic or just think this is too funny, it’s available for purchase from Target.

 

The “Boob” Dress.

Are you wondering what I mean? Is this a sexy low-cut number? Oh come on don’t you know the blog?! ;-) Read and look on.

Indie designer Emma Bell designs a lot of “crazy” if you will, but her frocks are all open to personal style interpretation until we get to the round things with … nipples? … on the chest, especially on this piece:

emma-bell_boob-dress

Those couldn’t be cupcakes, could they? Cupcakes atop breasts? Who does that! Other colors simply look like dyed fried eggs, so they’re marginally better. Get a dose of bright cheer from the Emma Bell website, if you dare.

emma-bell_ss2010-dresses

*Via* Kingdom of Style

Stay tuned for a bonus: The answer to the age-old question, “what is the opposite of nipple pasties?” Inquiring funny bones need to see! Read the rest of this entry »

 

‘Tis the Season’s Casual Fridays Do & Don’t

*Via Work Chic* What (not?) to Wear to Work

Do Not:

holiday-sweaters-casual-friday-dont

Holiday Sweaters - ALWAYS Do Not

Do!:

Now … someone tell my Aunt. Thank you. ;-)

See the similar post: The Holiday Sweater is reproducing! (gem sweaters)

 

Attack of the Monster Pump! Another Horror Shoe…

camilla-monster-pumps

Camilla Skovgaard fringe pumps

Camilla Skovgaard is an up-and-coming footwear designer. See this other shoe that got acclaim via FabSugar.

She’s gotten a lot of attention already, but this shoe might horrify too much.

I know fringe is a big trend but it seems instead of designers inventing subtle variations they seem to go. all. out!

Out they are indeed, $h-t!

I mean this shoe looks like a mix of Native American moccasin and … furry hoof.

Another scary shoe like the toeless boot. Gosh, which is worse?

Via another Fab Sugar post.

 

Sock Garters!?! IT or $h-t?

When one hears or reads about “sock garters”, that guy, gal, doll or dame may think of any a number of thoughts. There’s probably curiousity, intrigue or the quick urge to flag as fug.

But some fashionistas are already saying they can be at least kinda cute – so while I crave posting a photo of this odd hybrid-accessory (at least they don’t have a weird smushed name like “sarters”), I also should leave this open to public opinion. After all, they’re not necessarily forcing wearers into What Not to Wear-ers. (They can be hidden, but is that the intent?)

For your approval: A y (?) look from indie designer, SWAN clothing.

swan-sock-garters

Key = visible, BUT with heels.

But – mm – I don’t know. We don’t see the whole picture.

Then there’s a whole bunch of garter styles from Sock Dreams, including adjustable banded ones that can even match the knee socks themselves. Better? Worse? (I’m back and forth on those poofy-poodly/uggly ones.)

So this whole new sock-garters-for-women thing: IT or $h-t List?

*Update* The poll is closed. Stay tuned for more on this! Read my suggestions on what to pair/wear with these accessories.

To reiterate either way, just thank goodness our tween-zombied society hasn’t come up with “sarters”.

Or have they?

Dun dun dunnnnn.